RFC-006: Trust Exchange

Field	Value
RFC	006
Title	Trust Exchange
Status	Proposed
Depends on	RFC-001, RFC-004, RFC-010, RFC-012
Updates	,

Abstract

This document specifies how independent PTI implementations exchange portable trust packages: signed report manifests, selective event exports, and federation trust anchors. Trust Exchange enables multi-operator ecosystems without centralizing all data in one vendor.

Motivation

National-scale trust infrastructure may require multiple accredited operators, government registries, sectoral bureaus, regional edge nodes. A normative exchange protocol prevents proprietary lock-in and supports verifiable cross-network lookups.

Background

Exchange differs from ordinary lookup: the originating operator attests outcomes; the receiving operator verifies signatures and maps foreign PTI-IDs via federation registry. Raw event bulk transfer is discouraged; packaged evidence transfer is the default.

Terminology

Term	Definition
Trust package	Signed bundle of report manifest and optional evidence attachments
Federation anchor	Accredited operator public key and policy endpoint
Foreign PTI-ID	Subject identifier namespaced to originating operator
Exchange profile	Named ruleset for package contents and verification steps
Bilateral agreement	Legal and technical contract between two operators

Specification

1. Exchange principles

1. Packages MUST be signed by originating operator keys registered in federation registry.
2. Receiving operators MUST verify signature before presenting data to consumers.
3. Raw cross-operator event replication MUST NOT occur without explicit bilateral agreement and subject consent.
4. Exchange MUST preserve context_id semantics per RFC-002 without renaming.

2. Trust package format

A trust package MUST contain:

{
  "package_version": "pti.exchange.v1",
  "origin_operator_id": "op_rsa_registry",
  "foreign_pti_id": "pti_k9m2@op_rsa_registry",
  "report_manifest": { },
  "trust_evidence": { },
  "signature": {
    "alg": "EdDSA",
    "kid": "op_rsa_registry_2026",
    "value": "…"
  }
}

• report_manifest MUST conform to RFC-012.
• Attachments MAY include redacted event summaries, not full producer payloads, unless exchange_profile: full_evidence is agreed.

3. Federation registry

Operators MUST publish:

Endpoint	Content
/.well-known/pti-federation	Operator metadata, supported profiles
/federation/keys	JWKS or equivalent for signature verification
/federation/policies	Context entitlements accepted for inbound packages

Receiving operators MUST cache keys with TTL ≤ 24 hours and support key rotation overlap.

4. Identity mapping

• Foreign PTI-IDs MUST use format pti_{local}@{operator_id}.
• Receiving operators SHOULD map to local surrogate IDs for internal graph without merging graphs globally.
• Identity resolution across operators MUST follow RFC-011 confidence thresholds; auto-merge MUST NOT occur below configured threshold.

5. Exchange profiles

Profile	Contents	Use case
manifest_only	Signed manifest + scores	Low-latency cross-check
evidence_summary	Manifest + driver/event refs	Institutional audit
full_evidence	Redacted payloads + manifests	Government accredited exchange

Profiles MUST be declared in bilateral agreements.

6. Consumer presentation

When a lookup spans federated sources:

• Response MUST label each context slice with origin_operator_id.
• Consumers MUST see verification status per package (verified, failed, stale).
• Failed verification MUST exclude package data from decision fields (fail closed).

7. Revocation

• Originating operators MUST support package revocation list (PRL) with manifest_id and revoked_at.
• Receiving operators MUST poll PRL at least every 6 hours for government profile.

Security Considerations

• Operator private keys MUST be stored in HSM for government profile.
• Package replay MUST be prevented via generated_at freshness checks (max age configurable, default 30 days).
• Man-in-the-middle MUST be mitigated via mTLS between operator exchange gateways.

Privacy Considerations

• Cross-border exchange MUST document legal basis and adequacy mechanism.
• Subjects MUST be notified of federated sharing where required by applicable law.
• Minimum necessary fields per exchange profile MUST be enforced at package build time.

Examples

Cross-operator merchant verification

1. Operator A generates manifest_only package for merchant context.
2. Operator B verifies signature against A's federation keys.
3. Operator B serves combined lookup to consumer with origin_operator_id: op_a attribution.

Revoked package

{
  "manifest_id": "evm_22bd",
  "revoked_at": "2026-07-10T12:00:00Z",
  "reason": "subject_deletion"
}

Implementation Notes

• Implement verification as stateless microservice for horizontal scale.
• Log exchange latency separately from local lookup SLA.
• Start with manifest_only profile before negotiating full_evidence.

Future Work

• Multilateral federation governance framework
• Standard dispute resolution when signatures disagree
• Real-time package push via webhooks versus pull